학술 및 논문 자료 31

1. Author(year): Gaggin et al. (2013)

2. Study: PROTECT

3. Population: Chronic systolic HF NYHA class II-IV, recent HF exacerbation

4. Study description: Post-hoc analysis of ST2 and benefits of high-dose vs low-dose β-blocker therapy

5. N: 151

6. Average age(year): 63

7. Average LVEF(%): 27

8. Primary outcome: Total CV events

9. Follow-up duration: ~10 months

10. Summary of findings: ST2>35 and inability to achieve high β-blocker dose associated with increased risk; high-ST2 group had greatest absolute benefit from high-dose β-blocker therapy

11. Link: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000457

1. Author(year): Lupon et al. (2013)

2. Study: Barcelona

3. Population: Ambulatory HF

4. Study description: ST2, NT-proBNP, hsTnT and clinical risk factors; multimarker evaluation

5. N: 876

6. Average age(year): 70

7. Average LVEF(%): 34

8. Primary outcome: Death

9. Follow-up duration: 3.5 years

10. Summary of findings: ST2+hsTnT was best combo for improving risk stratification

11. Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025619612010920

1. Author(year): Broch et al. (2012)

2. Study: CORONA

3. Population: Chronic ischemic HF

4. Study description: Randomized trial of rosuvastatin vs placebo; post-hoc analysis of ST2, NT-proBNP and CRP

5. N: 1449

6. Average age(year): 72

7. Average LVEF(%): ‹40 (mean 32%)

8. Primary outcome: Cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI or stroke

9. Follow-up duration: 2.6 years

10. Summary of findings: ST2 associated with worsening HF(death due to worsening HF, hospitalization due to worsening HF) and any cardiovascular hospitalization

11. Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1093/eurjhf/hfs006

1. Author(year): Bayes-Genis et al. (2012)

2. Study: Barcelona

3. Population: Ambulatory HF

4. Study description: ST2 and NT-proBNP

5. N: 891

6. Average age(year): 70

7. Average LVEF(%): 34

8. Primary outcome: Death

9. Follow-up duration: 2.8 years

10. Summary of findings: ST2 associated with mortality

11. Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1093/eurjhf/hfr156

1. Author(year): Ky et al. (2011)

2. Study: Penn HF study

3. Population: Chronic ambulatory HF

4. Study description: ST2 and NT-proBNP levels and incremental usefulness over clinical models(SHFM)

5. N: 1141

6. Average age(year): 56

7. Average LVEF(%): 32

8. Primary outcome: Death or cardiac transplant

9. Follow-up duration: 2.8 years

10. Summary of findings: ST2 levels associated with increased risk; used with NT-proBNP, moderate improvement over SHFM

11. Link: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.110.958223

1. Author(year): Bayes-Genis et al. (2010)

2. Study: Barcelona

3. Population: Ambulatory decompensated HF

4. Study description: Serial ST2 and NT-proBNP

5. N: 148

6. Average age(year): 62

7. Average LVEF(%): 28

8. Primary outcome: Death, HF admission cardiac transplant

9. Follow-up duration: 1 year

10. Summary of findings: Higher ‘ST2 ratio’(2 weeks/baseline) associated with increased risk

11. Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1885585710702310

1. Author(year): Weinberg et al. (2003)

2. Study: PRAISE-2

3. Population: Severe Chronic nonischemic HF, NYHA class III - IV

4. Study description: ST2 and change in ST2

5. N: 161

6. Average age(year): 30

7. Average LVEF(%): ‹30 (mean 22%)

8. Primary outcome: Death or cardiac transplant

9. Follow-up duration: Not reported

10. Summary of findings: 2 weeks change in ST2 associated with mortality and cardiac transplant.

11. Link: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.CIR.0000047274.66749.FE

1. Author(year): Breidthardtet al.(2013)

2. Study: Basel

3. Population: ADHF in ED

4. Study description: Serial ST2 levels; evaluated early responders(≥25% drop in ST2 at 48h) vs nonresponders, and interactions with treatments

5. N: 207

6. Average age(year): 80

7. Average LVEF(%): 40

8. Primary outcome: Death

9. Follow-up duration: 1 year

10. Summary of findings: Poorer prognosis in ST2 nonreponders; survival benefits from β-blockers only seen in nonresponders.

11. Link:


1. Author(year): Shah et al. (2011)

2. Study: Multicenter

3. Population: Dyspnea in ED

4. Study description:  ST2 and NT-proBNP in ED patients; 5-center cohort study; n=200 with preserved LVEF 

5. N: 387

6. Average age(year): 58

7. Average LVEF(%): >50 in 200

8. Primary outcome: Death

9. Follow-up duration: 1 year

10. Summary of findings: ST2 associated with mortality, was the only independent predictor in the subgroup with normal LVEF.

11. Link:

1. Author(year): Socrates et al. 2010)

2. Study: Multicenter, international

3. Population: Dyspnea in ED

4. Study description: ST2, BNP and NT-proBNP in ED

5. N: 1091

6. Average age(year): 69

7. Average LVEF(%): 55

8. Primary outcome: Death

9. Follow-up duration: 30 days, 1 year

10. Summary of findings: ST2 levels were predictive at both time point; addictive to NPs.

11. Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02263.x

카카오톡 채널 채팅하기 버튼